On quinta-feira, 4 de fevereiro de 2016 11:50:47 PST ???(Uze Choi) wrote:
> Hyungjun,
> Let me classify your use case for each connectivity.
> IP connectivity (Wi-Fi/Eth) : multiple iotivity instance can exist work with
> different port. BT connectivity : multiple iotivity instance will make a
> collision together due to same UUID on RFComm. The multiple OIC BT
> application requires single iotivity instance which can aggregate the BT
> communication. For this requirement, daemon process model which was
> out-of-proc model defined before, is only solution I think. BR, Uze Choi

Ah, indeed, for a different type of transport like BT, we'll have problems.

Do we need BT? No, seriously, is it required? Can we not require a socket 
interface, like IPv4 and IPv6?

Remember that BT-GATT is not specified in OIC, it's purely an IoTivity 
extension. And remember that the Bluetooth SIG is working on 6lo-over-BTLE, 
which solves the problem by giving us IPv6.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to