Jon,
I don't see any attempt to propose static port binding, so the request doesn't 
violate any OIC intent.  In any case, since a node might support multiple 
servers, static port binding wouldn't work.
I understand the request is to make a server "try" to use a port that it used 
in a previous run.  We know that the "try" can be unsuccessful, so a discovery 
fallback is inevitable.
John Light

From: Jon A. Cruz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 1:30 PM
To: Light, John J; jjack.lee at samsung.com; Macieira, Thiago; iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Need API to set static "sid" and "port number".

One aspect here sounds like code is depending on IoTivity devices to operate 
like some other common servers where HTTP is on port 80, telnet is on port 23, 
ssh on port 22, SMTP is on port 25, etc. Compliance with company IT policies, 
firewall requirements, vpn rules, etc. might come into play there.

If this is so, then a question would be to ask if such port-bound services were 
counter to the OIC intent, within the OIC intent or un-addressed by it.


On the other hand, if it is just code counting on finding a device by using 
address+port as a key, then I would share concerns on such software being 
fragile.


On 01/22/2016 08:20 AM, Light, John J wrote:
Jack Lee (?),
In OCDoResource, you can supply a port number in the OCDevAddr argument.  
Network layer will use it, just as in original IoTivity.  So the same 
functionality exists.
I still have reservations about the design of counting on port numbers 
persisting.
John

From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at 
lists.iotivity.org> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of ???
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 9:47 PM
To: Macieira, Thiago; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org>
Subject: Re: [dev] Need API to set static "sid" and "port number".


-

OCDoResource()  must set port number.

How can forget it? If you right, then iotivity should be redesign.

Because, OCDoResource() has port number dependency.



If we support just one optional api, we can reduce re-discovery problem.

I don't understand why did yoy object to add "OPTIONAL" api although it can 
provide very useful user exprience.



And, old version iotivity could set port number... there is no issue about 
development







------- Original Message -------

Sender : Thiago Macieira<thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at 
intel.com>>

Date : 2016-01-22 14:19 (GMT+09:00)

Title : Re: [dev] Need API to set static "sid" and "port number".


On Friday 22 January 2016 02:25:47 jaekeun lee wrote:
> I didn't say that change the mechanism.
> I said, support the additional API for set to port number and sid or
> di(variable name is sid)  is very useful and helpful.
> The experience depends on how the application is written
> How can fix this issue?
> - Presence Check -> Re-Discovery -> Check saved DI & discovered DI -> change
> target's IP/PORT or
> - re configure every run
> These are very inconvenience .
>
> But, if server can set port, then re-configure only when server not work(may
> be ip changed or port occupied).
> Just additional API.

Forget the port number. If your other side is trying to depend on the port
number, please redesign it. You cannot count on the port number being free, so
your other side must be able to deal with the port number changing.

For that matter, the IP might change after a reboot. Or even without a reboot:
IPv6 temporary addresses change about once a day. Since you can't count on the
IP being fixed, port numbers don't identify anything.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



[cid:image001.gif at 01D15774.CBFEEEC0]

[http://ext.samsung.net/mailcheck/SeenTimeChecker?do=28bccb0e7a1e0d0665c2278d83f0484165a4919a5534baf50cf2282830c3416bfcfabd80c3fe6049141ee34884fd53a813d69ea60670f66ef4bcdeced46ed5ee08cece8541bc14eacf878f9a26ce15a0]




_______________________________________________

iotivity-dev mailing list

iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>

https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160125/8bf6ac02/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 13168 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160125/8bf6ac02/attachment.gif>

Reply via email to