It looks to me like OCDeviceEntityHandler should really be called OCDefaultResourceEntityHandler. Is that correct? Internally it's stored as defaultDeviceHandler. But in resource/csdk/stack/samples/linux/SimpleClientServer/ocserver.cpp it does essentially the same thing the OCEntityHandler does, namely forwards GETs to ProcessGetRequest, etc. So a request for any resource will be treated as a request for the (default) light resource?
Is that right? It seems to me that if my server receives a request for e.g. reading a resource it does not house it should respond with some kind of error message rather than respond with a reading the client did not ask for. I wonder if I'm misunderstanding the thinking behind OCDeviceEntityHandler. Thanks, Gregg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160617/318b6c01/attachment.html>
