On 03/08/2016 05:37 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On ter?a-feira, 8 de mar?o de 2016 17:32:53 PST Flavio Ceolin wrote: >>> PS: on the tinydtls licence, we had a confusion of which licence(s) >>> applied. It turns out that it's dual-licensed under both the EPL and the >>> EDL. The latter licence is compatible with our needs. >>> >>> >> Thiago is there a date when it will be done ? It's pretty hard keep >> compatibility with Iotivity due those local patches. Also this will always >> be a >> nightmare when we need to update to the latest tinytdls upstream. >> >> Is someone responsible for this task or we should also ask the patch >> authors to do this ? > There is no date and no one is assigned responsibility yet. > > I would say that each patch author needs to assume responsibility. And we > should set a deadline, after which patches not upstreamed will be silently > dropped.
It sounds like a good approach to me.
