Hello, Thiago Sorry again for the late questioning. According to the last ISG meeting, non-Apache(even Linking time) code need to be handled in the separate repository. which means they are not in the scope of IoTivity project which is governed by Apache2.0. However, this case looks want to be part of IoTivity project but not follows Apache license eventually.
I'd like make this rule clear to prepare the other license conflicting source code contribution such as AllSeen and so on later. If I'm wrong in somewhere, please correct me. BR, Uze Choi -----Original Message----- From: Bell, Richard S [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 8:46 AM To: uzchoi at samsung.com; Macieira, Thiago Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: [dev] Repository for IoTivity UPnP Bridge Hi Uze, I would think that we should have a bridge folder and individual folders for each bridge (i.e.: /iotivity/bridges/upnp-bridge, /iotivity/bridges/allseen-bridge, and etc.). I agree we should have individual maintainers for each bridge since they will be most familiar the code. Thanks, Rick Bell Senior Software Engineer OTC UPnP/DLNA Software Team Intel Corporation (503) 712 8209 -----Original Message----- From: ???(Uze Choi) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:14 AM To: Macieira, Thiago <thiago.macieira at intel.com> Cc: Bell, Richard S <richard.s.bell at intel.com>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: [dev] Repository for IoTivity UPnP Bridge Hi Thiago, My question was whether UPnP Bridge project is same level of IoTivit project such as security, primitive service, discovery & connectivity, iotivity cloud and iotivity-js and so on. You answer looks like UPnP Bridge is also a kind of project and not the part of a specific project. understandable... Anyway, overall level normalization of project looks required later. Some projects cover very huge scope, others do small. BR, Uze Choi -----Original Message----- From: Thiago Macieira [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 10:18 AM To: ???(Uze Choi) Cc: 'Bell, Richard S'; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Repository for IoTivity UPnP Bridge Em ter?a-feira, 8 de mar?o de 2016, ?s 09:37:04 PST, ???(Uze Choi) escreveu: > Thiago/Bell, > > A couple of small questions/concerns I have, .This is entitled as one > of IoTivity project? Hello Uze I'm not sure what you mean by "entitled". Can you clarify? It should be part of the IoTivity project, even if it's not inside the iotivity.git repository. > .If yes, can we call it IoTivity project in case of Out of the > IoTivity repository. I don't see why we couldn't. > .If we create other bridges such as AllSeen, MQTT, DDS and so on > later, should we set the other maintainer for each case? I think so. We need someone to care about that code. Some of those may be part of the main Discovery & Connectivity, but others won't. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
