On 3/30/16, 04:28, "???(Uze Choi)" <uzchoi at samsung.com> wrote:
>Hi Sakari, Sorry for late response. > >Could you clarify that node.js repo refers to iotivity.git repo as external >dependent library for base layer, [sakari] iotivity-node refers to iotivity git as an external repo. During the iotivity-node build, the developer can choose if he downloads the iotivity-node as part of the build OR uses an already existing .so and headers from the iotivity repo. > >Otherwise you want to keep the separate base layer code on new git repo? [sakari] I want to have a separate repo for the iotivity-node. No all the people want to download the Node.JS bindings for iotivity. Making a separate repo makes it possible. >I assumed that iotivity-node.js is same as language port such as Android, iOS >and Windows. [sakari] The concept is the same but totally different API and implementation >With the different platform build option, we can set up the build system. >I still cannot find any difference from other language port. [sakari] I think it would be cleaner this way. Sakari > >BR, Uze Choi >-----Original Message----- >From: Poussa, Sakari [mailto:sakari.poussa at intel.com] >Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:53 AM >To: Macieira, Thiago; ???(Uze Choi) >Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; Trevor Bramwell >Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting a repository for the IoTivity JavaScript bindings > >Hi, > >I want a separate repo for the iotivity-node. Dont want to merge it to the >existing one. You can think it as an extension to iotivity. > >I think quite a lot of other current iotivity directories should be separate >repos instead of inside one. > >Can you create a repo? iotivity-node is the name. > >Sakari > > > > >On 3/25/16, 18:12, "Macieira, Thiago" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote: > >>Hello Uze >> >>I don't think merging the code inside of iotivity.git is a good idea >>for the node.js support. The buildsystem is completely different and >>won't integrate with IoTivity's. Besides, I believe Sakari's plans also >>include making the API work on top of Soletta, not just main IoTivity. >> >>On sexta-feira, 25 de mar?o de 2016 17:22:30 PDT ???(Uze Choi) wrote: >>> Hi Sakari, >>> >>> Do you want the new repo in IoTivity? >>> I think it will be better to include it into iotivity.git repo. >>> Create the appropriate directory to push over there. >>> Anyway, new branch looks required. >>> Let me create the branch first ?iotivity-node? branch? (done) >>> >>> Clarify who should have the maintainer permission?so that Trevor can >>> include him as maintainer-group. >>> >>> BR, Uze Choi >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org >>> [mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Poussa, >>> Sakari Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:00 PM >>> To: Macieira, Thiago; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >>> Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting a repository for the IoTivity >>> JavaScript bindings >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Can we create the repo so we can move the iotivity-node code under >>> iotivity.org ? >>> >>> Who should I ping to get this moving? >>> >>> Sakari >>> >>> On 3/1/16, 17:04, "iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org on behalf >>> of >>Thiago Macieira" <iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org on behalf of >>thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote: >>> >Hello >>> > >>> >The bindings were relicensed. >>> > >>> >Are there any further requests or objections to the project? >>> > >>> >On ter?a-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 08:05:07 PST Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> >> Hello Jinguk >>> >> >>> >> Let me check if that is possible. >>> >> >>> >> On ter?a-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 09:07:06 PST ??? wrote: >>> >> > Thiago, >>> >> > >>> >> > Could you or sakari upload IoTivity JS source codes with Apache v2.0? >>> >> > >>> >> > BR >>> >> > >>> >> > Jinguk Jeong >>> >> > >>> >> > ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Thiago >>> >> > Macieira<thiago.macieira at intel.com> >>> >> > Date : 2016-02-23 01:20 (GMT+09:00) Title : Re: [dev] Requesting >>> >> > a repository for the IoTivity JavaScript bindings >>> >> > >>> >> > On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 16:01:57 PST Brian >>> >> > Warner >>wrote: >>> >> > > Hi Thiago, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Could you please provide a little more info? For example, the >>> >> > > link to the repo and the license under which it will be >>> >> > > contributed? >>> >> > >>> >> > It's currently at >>> >> > >>> >> > https://github.com/otcshare/iotivity-node >>> >> > >>> >> > and has been developed using the MIT licence. >>> > >>> >-- >>> >Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >>> > >>> > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center >>> > >>> >_______________________________________________ >>> >iotivity-dev mailing list >>> >iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >>> >https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> iotivity-dev mailing list >>> iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >>> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev >> >> >>-- >>Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center >> >
