Dear Mitch,
I don't see any need for motion or vote for OCF 1.0 Proposal. Today's OSWG CC had OCF 1.0 TF report presentation and update from SWG Krakow F2F regarding same. There was no objection or concerns heard. And as mentioned in trailing email this request is for 1.X i.e. may be 1.0 or future Spec. We should not overlook at some experimental features in IoTivity that can be beneficial for ASA interop. It is part of Spec Coordination TG process to let everyone chime with interested items if any to be standardized. To add more, this step is part of preparation for upcoming OCF Members F2F meeting @ Portland. As it takes time to come up with final list and required PPTs, I have started the process now. Regards Dwarka ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Software R&D Center | Software Platform Team | IoT Lab Open Connectivity Foundation - OSWG - Spec Coordination TG Chair Iotivity Steering Group - Advisory Committee From: sc_tg at openconnectivity.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mitch Kettrick Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:36 PM To: 'Dwarkaprasad Dayama'; sc_tg at openinterconnect.org; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; oswg at openinterconnect.org Cc: swg at openconnectivity.org Subject: [sc_tg] RE: [oswg] RE: [sc_tg] Request for new feature proposal in OCF 1.0 +SWG Hi Dwarka, I'm confused. At the F2F meeting, we agreed that the entire organization should be focused on OCF 1.0 = OIC 1.1 + ASA. Shouldn't the entire focus of IoTivity be on any features required for ASA interop? Maybe a vote similar to what occurred in SWG needs to also happen in OSWG to prioritize ASA. If a vote is not required, maybe this message needs to be communicated to the entire IoTivity team. Mitch From: oswg at openconnectivity.org <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:oswg at openconnectivity.org] On Behalf Of Dwarkaprasad Dayama Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:57 PM To: sc_tg at openinterconnect.org <mailto:sc_tg at openinterconnect.org> ; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org <mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> ; oswg at openinterconnect.org <mailto:oswg at openinterconnect.org> Subject: [oswg] RE: [sc_tg] Request for new feature proposal in OCF 1.0 +OSWG Regards Dwarka ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Software R&D Center | Software Platform Team | IoT Lab Open Connectivity Foundation - OSWG - Spec Coordination TG Chair Iotivity Steering Group - Advisory Committee From: sc_tg at openconnectivity.org <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:sc_tg at openconnectivity.org] On Behalf Of Dwarkaprasad Dayama Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 7:23 PM To: sc_tg at openinterconnect.org <mailto:sc_tg at openinterconnect.org> ; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org <mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: [sc_tg] Request for new feature proposal in OCF 1.0 Dear All, It is time to start working for IoTivity only features expected/wanted to be part of OCF 1.X. We should be able to decide final set of new items by mid of June 2016. Proposals will go through Spec Coordination TG review process before submitting to SWG. Note - As a part of OCF 1.0 TF, it has been agreed OIC 1.1 to be base version. Anything proposed should be additive and nothing shall be modified to maintain backward compatibility with devices certified in July'16 against OIC 1.1. Regards Dwarka ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Software R&D Center | Software Platform Team | IoT Lab Open Connectivity Foundation - OSWG - Spec Coordination TG Chair Iotivity Steering Group - Advisory Committee _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 2016.0.7596 / Virus Database: 4568/12206 - Release Date: 05/10/16 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160512/7aef0cb9/attachment.html>
