Zuberul/Woohwan are who is responsible for ios-ports task. Zuberul/Woohwan please reply for help.
BR, Uze Choi From: Antler, David A [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 12:29 PM To: ???(Uze Choi); Ferguson, Daniel J; m.zuberul at samsung.com; iotivity- dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: [dev] Request for ios-port branch Hi Uze, Thank you for your quick response. We want you to benefit from the work put in `windows-port`, but I do not know how quickly our branch will merge into `master`. Many of our changes are near completion; you may consider a merge from `windows-port` into `ios-port`. Currently our `windows-port` change sets are rebased weekly and held open for review on Gerrit (see # 7627 and prior) to welcome any feedback, but we can expedite submission since you have a need for them. Will this be helpful for you? Can you please guide us: how can we make it easy for you to build upon our changes? Regards, David Antler From: [email protected] [mailto:iotivity-dev- bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ???(Uze Choi) Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 6:19 PM To: Ferguson, Daniel J <daniel.j.ferguson at intel.com>; m.zuberul at samsung.com; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Request for ios-port branch Hi Daniel, Thank you for your guide. Let me clarify your comment. Do you want ios-port team to follows your updated scheme in its branch or you merge this update into master and we align to it by pull back? On ioTivity there are lots of language ports already. BR, UZe Choi From: Ferguson, Daniel J [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 8:09 AM To: uzchoi at samsung.com; m.zuberul at samsung.com; iotivity- dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: [dev] Request for ios-port branch Hi iOS platform team! We are currently working on enabling the Windows OS platform on the ?windows-port? branch. We have done extensive work to improve the portability in these areas: SCons flows, ip adapter, threading & synchronization, coap, tinydtls, and user facing shared libraries. Also, auto conf has been deeply integrated. Have you had a chance to take a look yet? We are hoping that you will find lots of useful changes. If there is something in our patches that could be useful, please review it, and we can start to expedite the submission process. We look forward to collaborating. Respectfully, Daniel Ferguson From: [email protected] [mailto:iotivity-dev- bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ???(Uze Choi) Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 2:08 AM To: m.zuberul at samsung.com; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Request for ios-port branch Created as ?ios-port? branch. BR, Uze Choi From: Mohammad Zuberul Islam [ <mailto:[email protected]> mailto:m.zuberul at samsung.com] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 3:38 PM To: <mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> iotivity- dev at lists.iotivity.org Cc: Woohwan Lee; Young Woong Kim; Uze Choi Subject: Request for ios-port branch Dear All, We announced our plan of ios-port few weeks back. Now, we are about to commit / upload our initial codebase. So requesting the repository owner to create a new branch. Thanks, Zuberul. Chief Engineer. Samsung R&D Institute Bangladesh. m.zuberul at samsung.com cid:image001.gif at 01D1AC60.12FDDD00 -------------- next part -------------- HTML ?????? ??????????????... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160513/38b588b7/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: ?????? ?? ????????. URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160513/38b588b7/attachment.gif>
