Hi Todd,

After you have done your normal IoTivity build, you should be able to add the 
following lines into your <IoTivity>/android/android_api/gradle.properties file:

TARGET_ARCH=armeabi
RELEASE=release
SECURED=1

Note: modify the values accordingly

Thereafter, you should be able to run the tests as you would usually do in 
Android studio.

Thanks,
Tim



From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Malsbary, Todd
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 1:05 PM
To: Morrow, Joseph L <joseph.l.morrow at intel.com>; iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] support for byte string in C++ APIs

How do I run the unit tests for android?  I added the necessary JNI and test 
code to the existing patch and would like to verify before pushing it up.

Thanks,
-Todd

From: Morrow, Joseph L
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:47 PM
To: Malsbary, Todd <todd.malsbary at intel.com<mailto:todd.malsbary at 
intel.com>>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org>
Subject: RE: support for byte string in C++ APIs

Hi Todd,

I believe this changeset tried to fix this, but it was hung up on a build error 
on the Android platform.

https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/7937/

I hope someone will be able to close out the Android issue and this solution 
can be accepted into IoTivity C++ SDK.

Thanks,

Joey Morrow

From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at 
lists.iotivity.org> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Malsbary, Todd
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:38 PM
To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org>
Subject: [dev] support for byte string in C++ APIs

Hello,

Does the C++ API support byte strings?  I see in the C API 
OCRepPayload{Set,Get}PropByteString() functions but I don't see the equivalent 
in OCRepresentation.

Thanks,
-Todd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160519/9ba0ed4a/attachment.html>

Reply via email to