On 03/11/16 14:37, VanCutsem, Geoffroy wrote: > Hi folks, > > Not sure whether this is the right mailing list to ask but I looked today at > the meta-oic [1] layer. It was recently upgraded to IoTivity 1.1.1 (using > IoTivity 1.1-rel maintenance branch), thanks Philippe for helping with this! > What caught my attention however is that there are a couple of recipes > (inside recipes-apps [2]) which seem out-of-date (one indicates a 1.1.0 > version and the other is at 1.0.0). Both use code that's found in a tarball > (vs. code pulled from the IoTivity Github repo). My question therefore is: > should these be either updated or removed completely (if obsolete)? > > Thanks, > Geoffroy > > [1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oic/ > [2] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oic/tree/recipes-apps
Hi Geoffroy, About, meta-oic I also have a 1.2.0 recipe to be shared (maybe next week) yea I know about those samples I tried my best to make them build on current release. I am wondering if anyone is using them? Note one is intel specific. IMHO, it's better to have a couple of examples outside iotivity project, to be linked without rebuilding the whole project (using scons). So back to your question, it's better to keep them in meta-oic as example to base on. Meanwhile I've wrote a couple of new simple examples, using mraa, sysfs or csdk, and they are working on yocto, Tizen (wearables), Arduino too I made a basic implementation of OCF binary switch (to control a relay). More details at bottom : https://wiki.iotivity.org/examples They need to be polished, but they might finish in meta-oic soon or later.
