Hi Mitch,

Thank you for your great summary and sharing effort.



I?m little bit afraid that some item from below create another action item
to be done in IoTivity v1.2-rel.

When do you expect it will be cleared and what is the critical path from
IoTivity side for this activity?



Items to be added to the IoTivity Reference Device or still to be tested:

?         Collections

?         Run all sever-role test cases against a device that is primarily
in the Client role



BR, Uze Choi

From: Mitch Kettrick [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:33 AM
To: '??? (Uze Choi)'; '???'; 'Heldt-Sheller, Nathan'; Richard Bardini
Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; cert_wg at openconnectivity.org; Jacek
Hryszkiewicz
Subject: RE: CTT Gap status sharing request



Hi Uze,



I?ll let Nathan and/or Dongik provide specific details about any Security-
related issues if needed.  Here is my understanding of where we are right
now:



Items to be fixed on CTT v1.4

?         CT1.7.7.1 updated to append ACE with random UUID rather than
adding a ?*? ACE for /oic/p which already exists

?         Update CT1.7.8.1 for Clients - CTT sends a GET to /oic/d which
has an ACE installed

?         Update CT1.7.8.2 to allow any 4.xx error code (CTT now allows
4.01 Unauthorized only)

?         Update to align with Security CR46 which allows only doxm and
pstat to be accessed over CoAP rather than all SVRs.  There is already an
IoTivity patch for this (#14137)



Items still to be fixed on IoTivity v1.2-rel

?         IPv4/IPv6 changes as discussed by Thiago

?         NON block-wise transfer (current analysis indicates this is an
IoTivity issue - email attached)

?         Add Policy ?p? to any Collection as discussed by Joey from
Intel (email attached)



Items to be added to the IoTivity Reference Device or still to be tested:

?         Collections

?         Run all sever-role test cases against a device that is primarily
in the Client role



Core schema file changes (Richard)

?         Update changes to OIC Link schema file as agreed at the F2F

?         Update OIC Link schema file to address issues found by Comarch
(pull request 30)



Thanks,

Mitch



From: ??? (Uze Choi) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 11:32 PM
To: ???; Heldt-Sheller, Nathan; Mitch Kettrick
Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; cert_wg at openconnectivity.org
Subject: CTT Gap status sharing request



Hi Nathan/Dongik/Mitch



As a main IoTivity/CTT developer, I?d like to ask you to share IoTivity
1.2.1 and CTT1.4 Gap.



Items To be fixed on CTT 1.4

-       aaa

-       bbb

Items To be fixed on IoTivity 1.2-rel

-       ccc

-       ddd

Interoperability Test status

-       the lastest testing event: IOTIVITY 1.2-rel (changeID: xxx), CTT
1.3.kk

-       fail 1: aaa/ccc

-       fail 2: bbb/ddd



Currently there are several pieces of mail, but too fragmented and detail.

Following format or equivalent simple format will be helpful I think.



BR, Uze Choi

-------------- next part --------------
HTML ?????? ??????????????...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161122/748064ac/attachment.html>

Reply via email to