Personally, I would prefer keeping it simple.   Don?t filter loopback, let you 
discover yourself.
If non-IP technologies (which aren?t supported in the OCF spec) don?t loop back 
themselves, then the adapter code should do so for consistency.
But if you run IP over those technologies, the IP stack will loop back 
multicast.

From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Jaewook Jung
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:45 PM
To: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Multicast loop back on IP


I was thinking that multicast loopback should be totally blocked. Not be 
processed on higher layer instead.

Could you explain any reason why the multicast packet must be delivered to 
itself?

I don't find any practical one.



If the multicast loopback is blocked, unicast loopback never happens since we 
don't discover the own resource.





--------- Original Message ---------

Sender : Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira 
at intel.com>>

Date : 2016-10-10 17:49 (GMT+9)

Title : Re: [dev] Multicast loop back on IP



On segunda-feira, 10 de outubro de 2016 08:06:33 CEST Jaewook Jung wrote:

> I implemented to filter the loopback packet, comparing with the own ip+port

> which has been got when ip adapter becomes enabled.



Then you're missing half of the change. We agreed that filtering the looped

back packets makes sense *because* we would need to insert a loop back of our

own, higher in the stack, given that other technologies won't loop back.



Queries sent to multicast must still match local resources.



--

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com

  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center









[cid:image001.gif at 01D22324.0F518040]

[http://v70ext.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=jw0213.jung&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTYxMDExMDA0NDQ4ZXBjbXMxcDFlMWQzN2M1YTIwMTVlYmQ1YmRiNjVmZTU2NWExYWQ5OCZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPWlvdGl2aXR5LWRldkBsaXN0cy5pb3Rpdml0eS5vcmc_]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161011/3b0a32e2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 13402 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161011/3b0a32e2/attachment.gif>

Reply via email to