Em quarta-feira, 12 de outubro de 2016, ?s 16:15:56 CEST, Gregg Reynolds 
escreveu:
>  the larger point being that if the feature is underspecified, and the
> protocol cstchescon, we can expect non-interoperable implementations that
> can legitimately claim to be conformant.

That's very clear. We've already established that this protocol is flawed and 
needs to be replaced. I was assuming we were discussing the case after we fixed 
the feature.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to