I am a little concerned that removing the android_x86 build will leave us open for hard to find issues down the line.
ARM and x86 are a very different architectures. Do we believe all the x86 problems for android will be found by the Linux builds? I also think that we don't need to build three variations of the x86 build (We were building a build for each target transport IP, BT, and BLE) Once https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/10239 is merged I think it would be a good idea to enable a build of android_x86 for one of the target transports. George Nash -----Original Message----- From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ???(Uze Choi) Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2016 9:16 PM To: 'Trevor Bramwell' <tbramwell at linuxfoundation.org>; 'uzchoi at samsung.com via RT' <iotivity-helpdesk at rt.linuxfoundation.org> Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] [IoTivity Helpdesk #28906] [linuxfoundation.org #28906] RE: Question for bui Trevor, Thanks for your work. However, linux_unsecured_with_tcp is not included on master yet. Could you check it. BR, Uze Choi -----Original Message----- From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev- [email protected]] On Behalf Of Trevor Bramwell Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 1:06 PM To: uzchoi at samsung.com via RT Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] [IoTivity Helpdesk #28906] [linuxfoundation.org #28906] RE: Question for bui Hi Uze, On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:37:21PM -0400, uzchoi at samsung.com via RT wrote: > Hi Trevor,There is no objection for this build job clearing could you > apply into iotivity?BR Uze Choi > The previous request is valid > when removing some build jobs can shorten the build verification > waiting time. Yes, I will remove the following jobs: - linux_secured_with_ra - linux_secured_with_rd - android_x86 - linux_unsecured_with_rd - linux_unsecured_with_ra > Anyway, the following build job needs to be added at least. > https://build.iotivity.org/ci/job/iotivity-verify-linux_unsecured_with > _tcp/44/ This build was only valid on rel-1.1 branch work now. I will also fix linux_unsecured_with_tcp so it only builds on 1.1-rel. Regards, Trevor Bramwell _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
