> When you were test it, which platform (e.g.: linux, qemu_x86 and ETC.) >and > sample app(e.g.: /apps/simpleserver.cpp) in iotivity-constrained did you >use?
I have tested on Linux between IoTivity?s simpleclient and IoTivity-Constrained?s simpleserver, and I used to use the OBT in resource/csdk/security/provisioning/sample/provisioningclient. - Kishen Maloor Intel Open Source Technology Center From: ??? <[email protected]> on behalf of ??? <hj210.choi at samsung.com> Reply-To: "hj210.choi at samsung.com" <hj210.choi at samsung.com> Date: Sunday, February 12, 2017 at 11:26 PM To: Kishen Maloor <kishen.maloor at intel.com>, ??? <hj210.choi at samsung.com>, "iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org" <iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: RE: Re: [dev] Question about IoTivity-constrained security. Hello Kishen. First, I appreacite your variable information. Sorry, one more question. When you were test it, which platform (e.g.: linux, qemu_x86 and ETC.) and sample app(e.g.: /apps/simpleserver.cpp) in iotivity-constrained did you use? Kind Regards, Hyungjun. --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Maloor, Kishen <kishen.maloor at intel.com> Date : 2017-02-10 11:17 (GMT+9) Title : Re: [dev] Question about IoTivity-constrained security. > Is the security implementation of iotivity-constrained compatible with >iotivity? Yes. > I mean, have you ever tested secure data transfer between a server of >iotivity- > constrained and a client of iotivity? Yes. IoTivity-Constrained supports the ?Just works? OXM, and 128-bit pre-shared key. You?d have to use IoTivity?s provisioning tool for on-boarding and provisioning. It used to work perfectly until a few weeks ago when I last checked. At that time it seemed like the provisioning tool was broken. The OBT would crash, or would fail to provision credentials. I don?t know if that?s been fixed. But, IoTivity-Constrained does continue to successfully go through those steps with the CTT. Thanks, -Kishen. - Kishen Maloor Intel Open Source Technology Center From: <[email protected]> on behalf of ??? <hj210.choi at samsung.com> Reply-To: "hj210.choi at samsung.com" <hj210.choi at samsung.com> Date: Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 5:09 PM To: "iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org" <iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: [dev] Question about IoTivity-constrained security. Hello? I have a few question about the security implementation of iotivity-constrained. Is the security implementation of iotivity-constrained compatible with iotivity? I mean, have you ever tested secure data transfer between a server of iotivity-constrained and a client of iotivity? Kind Regards, Hyungjun. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: ATT00001.gif URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170213/9d116a71/attachment.gif>
