On 01/17/2017 09:19 AM, Philippe Coval wrote: > Hi Mats >> If those are all classed as maintenance that's >> fine, but it's still been a little unexpected to see so much traffic >> after the release.
> It would be nice to release a 1.2.2 too. I think that's what I was leading to, without ever getting to saying so: if there have been many changes to 1.2.1, it's hard for people basing their product work on 1.2.1 to keep track. Seems like we ought to be planning on 1.2.2 to roll up the changes, so there's a clean release. I know doing another release is a pain and consumes a fair bit of work, but how else to be reliably confident the changes get in the hands of the people using 1.2 branch?
