How is that different from a unicast GET /oic/res?

From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hofemeier, Ulf
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 8:39 AM
To: Morrow, Joseph L <joseph.l.morrow at intel.com>; iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] New Request Type: PING (Like Get, Put, Post, ...)

+1

Ulf

From: <iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces 
at lists.iotivity.org>> on behalf of "Morrow, Joseph L" <joseph.l.morrow at 
intel.com<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, June 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM
To: "iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org>" <iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org>>
Subject: [dev] New Request Type: PING (Like Get, Put, Post, ...)

Hi All,

I was wondering if it would be a good a idea to add a Ping request type. Used 
primarily for development, or technician-level debugging.

I?m thinking there should be a lightweight and static way to check if an 
IoTivity/OCF stack is up and running without doing discovery or a full CRUDN 
request.

+1 this if you think it?s a good idea. If people like it, maybe we can get some 
support to add it, or discuss ideas.

Let me know.

Thanks,

Joey Morrow
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170705/ee4e05ee/attachment.html>

Reply via email to