Hi Uze, Thiago, Wouter, Mats and all, Thank you for the information. To clarify:
* I?m proposing a new IoTivity project as UPnP-Bridge and AllJoyn- Bridge in IoTivity. * OCF slides should not be shared here? Noted and apologies. Now I?d like to know the steps which can get things done. Thanks! Betty Zhao Haier Group -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:iotivity-dev- bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ??? (Uze Choi) Sent: 2017?7?7? 13:04 To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] New project for approval I think Betty intended to propose the new iotivity project (not OCF project), as like IoTivity alljoyn-bridge and upnp-bridge project. However, the attachment includes the associated OCF project information which is not required in IoTivity. Just filtering out the OCF specific context will resolve the Mat and Thiago concerns, I think. If this is new IoTivity project proposal, ISG should decide to approve. BR, UZe Choi -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:iotivity-dev- bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 10:24 AM To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] New project for approval On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 12:34:08 PDT Mats Wichmann wrote: > 2. in terms of starting a "new project", you should read these two > pages and prepare internally to follow these procedures and respond to > any questions that can arise: > > https://www.iotivity.org/get-involved/feature-development > https://www.iotivity.org/get-involved/contribution-guidelines > > > "Starting a new project" in effect means the interested parties making > the proposal are prepared to contribute the code, work on the > integration, maintain the code (and hopefully actually provide a > maintainer to the project), and to convince the project infrastructure > that when it comes time to allocate QA resources that there is value > in including this new feature in the test plan - of course being a > feature in an approved OCF specification feature clearly helps with this argument. Thank you Mats ,I meant to send something along those lines. Betty, thank you for the interest. Since this follows the vision of the IoTivity project, the ISG does not need to approve this; only the maintainers do. So this needs to be a technical discussion: what the features you want to implement are and how you and your engineers would like to do so. Please look at the feature development page (link above) and decide how to proceed. You may skip some phases or overlap them depending on how small the feature is (e.g., if it's just a plugin to the bridge host). -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
