> but such cleaning patches should wait until after 1.3 is released.
> And yes the helpdesk ticket is still waiting for action from CJ. I am not sure if I follow the plan.. Arduino is still part of the 1.3 release but isn't going to be tested anymore? On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com > wrote: > On quarta-feira, 22 de mar?o de 2017 09:47:48 PDT Thiago Moura wrote: > > Well, it's been awhile and no decision on this topic. > > The decision was made after discussion on the mailing list: Arduino > support is > being removed from the IoTivity Standard. If anyone wants to revive it, > they're welcome to do so in Constrained. > > > I am very curious if anyone here is developing real products based on > > arduino (due/mega). > > Intel's research shows no one develops products with Arduino. They use it > for > early proof-of-concepts, then throw everything away and rewrite the code > (no > code reuse) when going to actual product prototypes. > > At most, Arduino gets used by hobbyists for one-off implementations in > their > own homes. So it's worthwhile to make it work, but not at the expense of > real > products. > > > Back to the subject.. I think dropping support for Arduino will benefit > > everyone - Increase maintainability(code and build system cleanup), > faster > > CI and less headaches for project managers. I've found this > > opened/unresolved tickets on Jira, most of them pending for more than 1 > > I agree. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -- *Thiago Guedes Cunha de Moura* Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o Instituto de Ci?ncias Exatas e Biol?gicas - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto cel.: (31)99484-9864 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170323/5d20cd22/attachment.html>
