Thanks Gregg. Will surely give it a try. Cross-compiling with make works OK. Let us see what Bazel offers there.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Khaled Elsayed <khaledi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Great to know I was not the only one who dislike scons. Never worked >>> with Bazel. Still think that make/autoconf are the greatest tools in >>> software :) I think that if a bold switch to make is done, it will be a >>> great step forward at least to break the barrier for a learning curve for >>> another build environment. >>> >> >> Check out bazel. See e.g. the query facility >> <https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/query-how-to.html>. Very cool. >> >> I think make would work with OpenOCF due to the simplified code >> organization. I would not want to be tasked with writing Makefiles for >> Iotivity, though. >> > > The other point I would make about make is that things get hairy when you > need cross-compiling support. Bazel's support for this is what really won > me over. > >
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
