On Feb 26, 2018 1:43 PM, "Mats Wichmann" <m...@wichmann.us> wrote:


is there any point to setting up a naming convention for C++ header files?


Emphatic yes. I would go further:

foo.[ch] : 100% C, no C++

A file that contains any C++ should be foo.cxx or foo.cpp or foo.hpp etc.
...


P.S. this is the list that does use .hpp at the moment:


'Nother thing: mixing C and C++ is bad.  The resource/ directory should
contain no cpp imho.

G
_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Reply via email to