On 06/11/2018 04:46 PM, Margaret LaBrecque wrote: > I agree that the OSWG is really like the TSC for IoTivity ... and last thing > we need is yet another forum. We should put together a proposal for how we > can streamline the processes (e.g., maintainer approvals, etc.)
Thiago had a proposal which would have had some of this effect - last report I heard was it didn't gain traction. It's still listed on the projects and maintainers page, though: https://wiki.iotivity.org/projects_and_functions -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9700): https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/9700 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/21995760/21656 Group Owner: iotivity-dev+ow...@lists.iotivity.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
