Thanks Nathan. Shall join OCF and get that ... Did not know there is free
membership option.


On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <
nathan.heldt-shel...@intel.com> wrote:

> Khaled,
>
>
>
> If you have any questions regarding the OCF onboarding process I can
> probably answer them.  If you would like an overview of the Resources
> involved in onboarding and access control, please take a look at the OCF
> Security Primer for Device Vendors
> <https://workspace.openconnectivity.org/apps/org/workgroup/security_wg/download.php/15855/latest>.
> Note that you’ll need to join OCF in order to access that link, but basic
> membership is free so I encourage you to do so if you haven’t already!
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan
>
>
>
> *From:* iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.
> iotivity.org] *On Behalf Of *Khaled Elsayed
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2018 1:06 AM
> *To:* Scott King <scott.k...@fkabrands.com>
> *Cc:* Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com>; iotivity-dev <
> iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dev] MQTT G/W
>
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the much-needed feedback. You raised a lot of important issues.
> I am not really expert on the IoTivity cloud side and the on-boarding
> process. However, I can address some of the issues early next week. I will
> draft a document to contain the issues instead of using e-mail to
> facilitate the process.
>
>
>
> Also, thanks to highlight the aedes broker implementation. I did not know
> about it. I think it would be easy to port the code to it. Let me check if
> it is worth replacing mosca.
>
>
>
> Stay tuned.
>
>
>
> Khaled
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Scott King <scott.k...@fkabrands.com>
> wrote:
>
> Khaled,
>
>
>
> I’d like to start by saying that this work has the potential to be very
> valuable to the ecosystem, especially for those that want to use existing
> MQTT services like AWS IoT, thanks for the contribution! I look forward to
> discussing what details need to be added to make the MQTT broker totally
> transparent to the OCF client and ensure compatibility with managed MQTT
> brokers from the “big 3” western public clouds.
>
>
>
> ·         There should probably be more specs for device onboarding and
> cloud-side handling of messages:
>
> o   How does the device provisioning process differ from the current
> cloud spec?
>
> §  Are we assuming that all local network communication still uses
> iotivity/coap?
>
> o   How does the device determine whether it’s being setup with a coap
> cloud or mqtt cloud? (hopefully that could be determined from the URI)
>
> §  If there are subtle differences between how to interface with MQTT
> brokers from different public clouds, how do you communicate that to the
> device?
>
> o   How does the MQTT broker know to delete the topic when the user
> deletes the device?
>
> §  I guess this is more me ensuring this is planned to be implemented
> rather than asking how to go about doing it
>
> o   How did you want to handle bi-directional communication?
>
> §  The device not only needs to know where to publish, but also where to
> subscribe and how to interpret the payloads
>
>
>
> ·         I’m not 100% clear what work needs to be done to translate MQTT
> messages for a OCF client
>
> o   How is the device supposed to publish/expose/advertise its
> resources/metadata such that the resource directory can correctly respond
> to discovery/introspection requests?
>
> o   How are you retaining the POST/GET semantics?
>
> o   Will there be any modifications to the payload? If so, does this
> introduce any complications? I forget if iotivity uses CWT/COSE (RFC
> 8392/8152)
>
>
>
>
>
> ·         I’m interested to hear your thoughts on MQTT topic/OCF resource
> syntax
>
> o   Ex: maybe devices should subscribe to the topics like
> {userID}/{deviceID}/client/{resourceName} and publish to
> {userID}/{deviceID}/server/{resourceName}
>
> §  It seems like breaking up your topics by resource is a best practice
> https://www.hivemq.com/blog/mqtt-essentials-part-5-mqtt-
> topics-best-practices
>
> §  not sure how you store the relevant metadata about the resource though
> (ex: what resource type is {resourceName}? How am I supposed to know that
> “bathroomLight” is oic.r.switch.binary instead of oic.r.light.brightness?)
>
>
>
> PS: have you evaluated aedes? Mainflux uses that as their MQTT broker and
> it’s my understanding it was built to replace mosca.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.
> iotivity.org] *On Behalf Of *Khaled Elsayed
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 3:54 AM
> *To:* Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com>
> *Cc:* iotivity-dev <iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [dev] MQTT G/W
>
>
>
> Hi Greg and all,
>
>
>
> I attach the current design. Would appreciate your review.
>
>
>
> I have developed a node.js gateway module based on the  node.js mosca MQTT
> broker library and iotivity-node. The flows in the simplest forms are
> provided in the attached PDF for handling both MQTT publisher publishing a
> new topic and MQTT subscriber subscribing to a new topic.
>
>
>
> It is also possible to create an MQTT topic for any OCF resource that an
> OCF resource owner wishes to expose to prospective MQTT subscribers. I have
> not done that yet.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 8:45 PM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 1:36 PM Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 6:28 AM Khaled Elsayed <khaledi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Has anyone developed a MQTT gateway that would host a MQTT broker
> receiving the MQTT publish requests and creates OCF resources corresponding
> to the MQTT topics and handles the update of the resources data. It should
> not be that difficult so I am asking it is already there to avoid doing it
> again.
>
>
>
> If it does not exist, would it be interesting for the IoTivity community
> to have OCF/iotivity and MQTT inter-operability?
>
>
>
> Speaking in my delusional capacity as voice of OCF community: yes.
>
>
>
> Just one thing: if you're gonna do this please post your design ideas
> before you start coding in anger. Lots of ways to do it, you'll wanna get
> feedback as early as possible.
>
>
>
> G
>
>
>
> Gregg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#9955): 
https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/9955
Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/24817907/21656
Group Owner: iotivity-dev+ow...@lists.iotivity.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to