Dear iotivity-dev list,

searching in the web about the usage of CoAP for cloud scenarios, I
stumbled over your wiki https://wiki.iotivity.org/coapnativecloud.
Generally I appreciate the most on that page. But on one point, the
usage of "coap over tcp" instead of "coap over dtls", I would like to
add some more information about the recent development in DTLS of the
last months.

Using DTLS 1.2 in cloud scenarios was a pain for long time. With NATs in
between, DTLS connections/peers-associations expired frequently after a
few seconds of quiet. With the introduction of a DTLS connection ID,
this has changed. The IETF TLS working-group has released the 4th draft
in the meantime (see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id) and,
if no objection was raised, the TLS group will assign early code-point
for the values of that draft. The eclipse java open source project
californium (I’m one of the committers of this project) offers now since
several weeks a first implementation and we even managed to provide a
basic demonstration setup for a stateless load-balancer for DTL 1.2
using that connection ID (see
https://github.com/eclipse/californium/wiki/DTLS-1.2-connection-ID-based-load-balancer).

So, may be you analyze again, if using "coap over DTLS" would not make
sense. From my view point, no other technique is able to provide a high
efficient, encrypted, mostly stateless, cloud-cluster-prepared
communication infrastructure. Not all components are “ready for
production” especially the demonstration load-balancer only demonstrates
the functionality. But that may be a part, where a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project is much more closer to than a java library.

Best regards
Achim Kraus

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10205): 
https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/10205
Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/31188187/21656
Group Owner: iotivity-dev+ow...@lists.iotivity.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to