Hi
I have a question about SVR DB sample in IoTivity classic. There are sample codes & SVR DB in "resource/csdk/stack/samples/linux/secure". There are 2 samples (occlientbasicops, ocserverbasicops). occlientbasicops uses *oic_svr_db_client_devowner.json* or *oic_svr_db_client_nondevowner.json* ocserverbasicops uses *oic_svr_db_server.json*. network topology is as follows: [image: image.png] according to *oic_svr_db_server.json*, Server has already been onboarded by *DevOwnerClient*. (doxm.devowneruuid is 32323232-3232-3232-3232-323232323232) The strange point in oic_svr_db_server.json is *rowneruuid* of /oic/sec/doxm, /oic/sec/pstat, /oic/sec/acl2 are Server itself (31313131-3131-3131-3131-313131313131). In my understanding rowneruuid of them should be OBT (in case that DOTS, CMS, AMS are implemented in the same device). 5.4.2 of Security spec says: The DOTS shall update the rowneruuid Property of the "/oic/sec/doxm" and "/oic/sec/pstat" resources with the DOTS resource owner identifier. The DOTS shall update the rowneruuid Property of the "/oic/sec/cred" resource with the CMS resource owner identifier. The DOTS shall update the rowneruuid Property of the "/oic/sec/acl2" resource with the AMS resource owner identifier Is this correct SVR DB or not? Thanks & BR 🙂 - Kevin -- -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Joo-Chul Kevin Lee, ETRI 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, daejon, 305-700, KOREA E-mail: r...@etri.re.kr/cms.r...@gmail.com Tel: +82-42-860-1021 -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10254): https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/10254 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/32743835/21656 Group Owner: iotivity-dev+ow...@lists.iotivity.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
