On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Richard Henderson via iovisor-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, that was quick.
thanks! > Would someone from the iovisor project like to be the official contact for > this? Otherwise I'll give them contact details for Red Hat. can probably put my name or something generic like 'BPF developers'. and [email protected] as an email. If you can leave the phone number empty that's the easiest. Brenden, any suggestions? > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: Request ELF e_machine number for Linux BPF > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:15:49 +0200 > From: Michael.Brinke-Engel <[email protected]> > To: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>, [email protected], > [email protected] > > > > Hi RIchard, > > Thanks for your request. > > The following values for your request will be added to the web document of > gABI: > > EM_BPF 247 Linux BPF – in-kernel virtual machine > > Can you please let me have the necessary details for the official contact > with regard to this entry: > > *Contact info for EM_BPF* > > * Name ??? > * Phone ??? > * E-mail ??? > > > Regards, > > Michael Brinke-Engel > > --- > > Am 16.06.2016 um 22:54 schrieb Richard Henderson: > >> The Linux kernel supports a virtual machine derived from the Berkeley >> Packet >> Filter (BPF) virtual machine. LLVM has a compiler backend targeting this >> virtual machine, which produces ELF object files. >> >> Currently, the LLVM backend is using EM_NONE, which is less than optimal >> for >> the rest of the compiler tool chain. >> >> We request an official number for the symbolic name EM_BPF, so as to >> improve >> this situation. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> r~ > > > _______________________________________________ > iovisor-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev _______________________________________________ iovisor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev
