G'Day,

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Suchakra <[email protected]> wrote:

> [...]

>> I added the patches/ directory to the project to try out this approach
> >> in applying a few CVE fixes.  I built a base patching shared library
> >> that reads and applies a patch description array.  New patched code is
> >> also included in this shared library.  The patching mechanism applies a
> >> code-trampoline at given locations routing the binary away from the old
> >> code and into the newly loaded patched code.
> >>
> >> It's only a proof-of-concept, but I did record a few .gif terminal
> >> sessions to show what's possible:
>

Great! Lowing overhead should open the door to new possibilities.


>
> I spent some time researching dynamic instrumentation for tracing a
> few years back . We started with a ptrace based approach and developed
> kaji (https://github.com/5kg/kaji) as a demo for inserting precompiled
> lttng tracepoints. This was also tested with dyninst. Here are some
> observations (http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/fr/system/files/11Dec2013.pdf).
> Here is also some investigation on what happens underneath
> (https://github.com/tuxology/lttng-ubench/blob/master/
> analysis/instr/dyninst_kaji).
>
> In addition, some other things to look out for would be :
> 1. Fast Tracepoints in GDB that use a similar trampoline approach
> 2. SystemTap's Stapdyn approach which uses dyninst
> (https://research.cs.wisc.edu/htcondor/HTCondorWeek2013/
> paradyn-slides/stone-stapdyn.pdf)
> 3. DynamoRIO (http://www.dynamorio.org/)
>
> Also, some folks I know have complained about dynins't huge memory
> consumption in a production simulation. I have not investigated that
> myself, but I can if we are heading in this direction. Also, it may be
> worthwhile to discuss if "spin-your-own" may be beneficial than an
> available and tested framework. For example, Dyninst does recursive
> trampoline checks and some other basic safety checks on snippets
> before inserting them. It seems overkill in some places, but sometimes
> it may add to robustness.
>

Suchakra, was this the same dyninst as http://www.dyninst.org/dyninst? Just
curious.

Brendan
_______________________________________________
iovisor-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev

Reply via email to