On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 11:53 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > > > reasonably simple? ;) > > > I suspect it doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls and BTF, right? > > > These were major additions that folks with custom loader > > > will be missing. > > > A lot more stuff to come with BTF, relocations, etc. > > > I don't think it will be feasible to replicate the same > > > functionality > > > in other libraries. > > > Hence everyone is highly encouraged to use libbpf. > > > c++, go or any other wrappers can go on top. > > > Whether they're kept as part of libbpf repo or repo next to it is > > > tbd. > > > > Correct. No BTF, I mostly had bpf calls going but didn't finish it > > because we don't need it right now. > > > > I understand the situation but this makes me a bit sad. I wrote the > > loader originally to avoid 'unsafe' code in our project. > > please define 'unsafe'
Not Go in the Go runtime :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1513): https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/message/1513 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iovisor.org/mt/27808558/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
