On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 07:43:31PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > hi, > we'd like to have bcc linked with libbpf instead of the > github submodule, initial change is discussed in here: > https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/2535 > > In order to do that, we need to have access to uapi headers > compatible with libbpf rpm, bcc is attaching and using them > during compilation. > > I added them in the fedora spec below (not submitted yet), > so libbpf would carry those headers. > > Thoughts? thanks,
I think it may break a bunch of people who rely on bcc being a single library. What is the main motiviation to use libbpf as a shared library in libbcc? I think we can have both options. libbpf as git submodule and as shared. In practice git submodule is so much simpler to use and a lot less headaches. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1790): https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/message/1790 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iovisor.org/mt/34373848/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
