On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:39 AM <mayfieldtris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Take a closer look. libbpf-tools do not use bpf_load.h, that one is
> deprecated and its use is discouraged. libbpf-tools rely on
> code-generated BPF skeleton. But really, get a close look at
> libbpf-tools, it has everything you need to get started.
>
>
> Will do. Does this mean that, going forward, BPF development will be 
> encouraged to use kernels compiled with "CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y"? I've been 
> using a default build up to now.

Yes. A lot of newer functionality relies on kernel BTF as well. But to
compile portable BPF program you also need kernel BTF (for BPF CO-RE
stuff).

> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1835): https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/message/1835
Mute This Topic: https://lists.iovisor.org/mt/72496365/21656
Group Owner: iovisor-dev+ow...@lists.iovisor.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to