Begin forwarded message:
From: Ken Kousky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 25, 2006 8:05:17 AM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Slipperiest of Slopes
Today's Wall Street Journal's editorial should make clear that
terrorism is
not a slippery slope at all. It's a cliff that conservatives have
already
jumped off.
Today's WSJ editorial states that extremist environmentalists who attack
property are terrorists. This makes clear that there is no difference
between domestic law enforcement engaged in protecting property and the
broad range of Homeland Security issues.
I guess this means that Eco-terrorists, as the WSJ labels them,
should be
considered for kidnapping to foreign bases for interrogation, certainly
wiretapped and they merit the use of our limited DHS resources. I'm
certainly glad we have the FBI on this.
I understand that once we all realize they're terrorists, they should
not be
excluded for civil liberty protections since an assault on property
can also
harm people and harming people is a terrorist tactic.
Didn't the Secretary of Education suggest that the NEA were
terrorists too?
Come to think of it, I find some rock music frighteningly bad....
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
