2008/4/22, Pedro Rafael Alves Simoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Now, I need to explain a thing, the Host2 has more than 1 network > interface. The server receives the data on the right interface, but > when it tries to connect to the client, the Host2_other_ip is used.
If this is not what you want, then it just means the routing table on Host2 is not configured as you would like it to be. Generally speaking you can receive packets on one interface while sending packets using a different interface... anything is possible, you just need to know what you want to do. > > [ 4] local Host1 port 32785 connected with HostOther port 5002 > [ 4] 0.0- 1.4 sec 112 KBytes 78.6 KBytes/sec > [ 4] local Host1 port 5002 connected with HostOther port 41725 > [ 4] 0.0- 2.0 sec 168 KBytes 84.9 KBytes/sec > > >From this output, I think that the client tries to connect a second > time to the server, now using a different port number (in this case > 41725). You might think wrong. The second connection definitely seems initiated by HostOther, 41725 looking like a random port assigned by the operating system. It seems that with iperf, the connecting/initiating side is always the data sending side. Both for upstream and downstream tests. Hope this helps. Marc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Iperf-users mailing list Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
