TIME_WAIT maybe? Just a guess.

http://www.developerweb.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2941


2008/7/11, Jones, Jeff L (PNB Engineering Lab) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  I'm running iperf 1.7.0.
>
>  I've got a layer 2 network with a windows XP server, an AP (connected via a 
> switch) and a windows XP wireless client.
>
>  I'm changing the setup of the AP and trying to use iperf to validate the 
> connection between the client and the network.
>
>  My windows server (113.1.128.43) is running an iperf server via:
>
>         iperf -s -I 1 -p 5001 -l 8k -t 10
>
>  The server is launched prior to any test and is assumed to be running 
> throughout my testing as I launch client sessions against it.
>
>  My client is a windows XP that is dual homed, ehternet (113.1.128.37) and 
> wireless (113.1.128.38).  I telnet to the ethernet interface  of the client 
> and launch iperf on the wireless interface via:
>
>         iperf -c 113.1.128.43 -B 113.1.128.38
>
>  I wait, read the results and log off.
>
>  I then change some parameters of the AP, wait for the client to reassociate 
> (I validate that is has) and, after 1-3 minutes, telnet into the client and 
> launch another iperf just as before.
>
>  The first iperf run works correctly, but the second one bombs with this 
> returned:
>
>         Connect failed: Address already in use
>         ---------------------------------------
>         Client connecting to 113.1.128.42, TCP port 5001
>         write1 failed: Transport endpoint is not connected
>
>         Binding to local address 113.1.128.38
>         write2 failed:  Transport endpointis not connected
>                 .
>                 .
>                 .
>         <reports 0 throughput>
>
>  I've tried disabling and re-enabling the client wifi adapter (via telnet and 
> DEVCON), I've tried using a ping to verify the connection, I've tried waiting 
> for up to a minute between runs, and I've tried combinations.  Most of the 
> time these actions do not make for a successful second run, but sometimes 
> they do.
>
>  Any ideas?
>
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>  Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>  along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
>  and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
>  _______________________________________________
>  Iperf-users mailing list
>  Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to