Hello,
I am running a test on two windows machines that are connected to each other 
through a local Gigabit 8-port switch.  One is a Dell power edge Windows 2003 
server and one is an XP laptop. Ports on both machines are running at 1Gbps and 
they have no other apps running on them besides iperf.  Windows 2003 server is 
acting as an iperf server and the laptop is acting as client
When I run udp test using ‘-b100m’ on the client with server running in 
default, I get about 95Mbps throughput but with lots of dropped packets.  I 
then start to increase the buffer size on both ends and find that at buffer 
size of ‘-w32MB’ dropped packets get down to zero.  To find max.udp  throughput 
on the 1Gbps link, I increased the bandwidth gradually to ‘the max. of –b2147m’ 
and found that the client would not even send anything faster than 115Mbps  
regardless of what I set the buffer size to be.  It was only when I decreased 
the datagram size to ‘-l900B’ on both ends that the client started sending data 
at about 700Mbps (even then it was inconsistent –kept varying from 
500-800Mbps-).  
How does iperf use “b, w and l” parameters?  Is there a way I can calculate or 
estimate their value in order to achieve max. UDP throughput for a given link? 
Below are some samples from my test (server reports for each are at the bottom):
Thank you,
Yousuf,
 
C:\Iperf>iperf -c10.10.10.80 -u -i1 -b100m -w16KB
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.10.10.80, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size: 16.0 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[1912] local 10.10.10.81 port 1680 connected with 10.10.10.80 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[1912]  0.0- 1.0 sec  10.9 MBytes  91.2 Mbits/sec
[1912]  1.0- 2.0 sec  11.8 MBytes  98.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  2.0- 3.0 sec  11.8 MBytes  98.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  3.0- 4.0 sec  11.8 MBytes  98.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  4.0- 5.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  97.4 Mbits/sec
[1912]  5.0- 6.0 sec  11.4 MBytes  95.8 Mbits/sec
[1912]  6.0- 7.0 sec  11.1 MBytes  92.7 Mbits/sec
[1912]  7.0- 8.0 sec  11.2 MBytes  94.3 Mbits/sec
[1912]  8.0- 9.0 sec  11.4 MBytes  95.8 Mbits/sec
[1912]  9.0-10.0 sec  11.2 MBytes  94.3 Mbits/sec
[1912]  0.0-10.0 sec   114 MBytes  95.7 Mbits/sec
[1912] Server Report:
[1912]  0.0-10.0 sec   112 MBytes  93.8 Mbits/sec  0.000 ms 1882/81491 (2.3%)
[1912] Sent 81491 datagrams
 
 
C:\Iperf>iperf -c10.10.10.80 -u -i1 -b100m -w1024KB
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.10.10.80, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size: 1.00 MByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[1912] local 10.10.10.81 port 1737 connected with 10.10.10.80 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[1912]  0.0- 1.0 sec  11.2 MBytes  94.3 Mbits/sec
[1912]  1.0- 2.0 sec  11.4 MBytes  95.8 Mbits/sec
[1912]  2.0- 3.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  96.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  3.0- 4.0 sec  11.7 MBytes  97.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  4.0- 5.0 sec  12.0 MBytes   100 Mbits/sec
[1912]  5.0- 6.0 sec  11.8 MBytes  98.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  6.0- 7.0 sec  11.8 MBytes  98.9 Mbits/sec
[1912]  7.0- 8.0 sec  11.4 MBytes  95.8 Mbits/sec
[1912]  8.0- 9.0 sec  11.2 MBytes  94.3 Mbits/sec
[1912]  9.0-10.0 sec  11.2 MBytes  94.3 Mbits/sec
[1912]  0.0-10.0 sec   115 MBytes  96.6 Mbits/sec
[1912] Server Report:
[1912]  0.0-10.0 sec   115 MBytes  96.8 Mbits/sec  0.000 ms    0/82287 (0%)
[1912] Sent 82287 datagrams
 
C:\Iperf>iperf -c10.10.10.80 -u -i1 -b2147m -w32MB
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.10.10.80, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size: 32.0 MByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[1912] local 10.10.10.70 port 2323 connected with 10.10.10.80 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[1912]  0.0- 1.0 sec  13.8 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec
[1912]  1.0- 2.0 sec  14.0 MBytes   117 Mbits/sec
[1912]  2.0- 3.0 sec  14.2 MBytes   119 Mbits/sec
[1912]  3.0- 4.0 sec  14.3 MBytes   120 Mbits/sec
[1912]  4.0- 5.0 sec  14.0 MBytes   118 Mbits/sec
[1912]  5.0- 6.0 sec  14.2 MBytes   119 Mbits/sec
[1912]  6.0- 7.0 sec  13.6 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec
[1912]  7.0- 8.0 sec  13.6 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec
[1912]  8.0- 9.0 sec  13.8 MBytes   115 Mbits/sec
[1912]  9.0-10.0 sec  13.8 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec
[1912]  0.0-10.0 sec   139 MBytes   117 Mbits/sec
[1912] Server Report:
[1912]  0.0-10.0 sec   139 MBytes   117 Mbits/sec  1.201 ms    0/99331 (0%)
[1912] Sent 99331 datagrams
 
C:\Iperf>iperf -c10.10.10.80 -u -i1 -b2147m -w32MB -l900B
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.10.10.80, UDP port 5001
Sending 900 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size: 32.0 MByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[1912] local 10.10.10.70 port 2325 connected with 10.10.10.80 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[1912]  0.0- 1.0 sec  80.5 MBytes   675 Mbits/sec
[1912]  1.0- 2.0 sec   101 MBytes   844 Mbits/sec
[1912]  2.0- 3.0 sec  99.6 MBytes   836 Mbits/sec
[1912]  3.0- 4.0 sec   104 MBytes   869 Mbits/sec
[1912]  4.0- 5.0 sec   102 MBytes   854 Mbits/sec
[1912]  5.0- 6.0 sec   104 MBytes   873 Mbits/sec
[1912]  6.0- 7.0 sec  93.1 MBytes   781 Mbits/sec
[1912]  7.0- 8.0 sec   102 MBytes   852 Mbits/sec
[1912]  8.0- 9.0 sec  93.6 MBytes   785 Mbits/sec
[1912]  9.0-10.0 sec  77.9 MBytes   653 Mbits/sec
[1912]  0.0-10.2 sec   956 MBytes   785 Mbits/sec
[1912] Server Report:
[1912]  0.0-10.2 sec   956 MBytes   787 Mbits/sec  19.225 ms    0/1114043 (0%)
[1912] Sent 1114043 datagrams
 
 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to