Hello All,

I have just download and complied with Cygwin  ver 2.0.5b1 (30 Mar 2010)

I did simple TCP test and i got some odd results on client side

the client /server network layout as follows

client >100Mbit>SWITCH>1Gbit >server

 [  3]  0.0-10.0 sec * 4096 MBytes  3436 Mbits/sec* its little bit high for
that infrastructure is there known bug

Please advice

Thanks

****************************CLIENT
SIDE*******************************************
Client connecting to qa-core-sql, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.01 MByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 212.143.237.19 port 9426 connected with 192.168.2.100 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0- 1.0 sec  0.05 MBytes  0.39 Mbits/sec
[  3]  1.0- 2.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  2.0- 3.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  3.0- 4.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  4.0- 5.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  5.0- 6.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  6.0- 7.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  7.0- 8.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  8.0- 9.0 sec  0.04 MBytes  0.33 Mbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  4096 MBytes  3436 Mbits/sec


***************************************server
side***********************************
C:\IPERF>iperf -s -f MB -l 64k
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.01 MByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  4] local 192.168.2.100 port 5001 connected with X.X.X.19 port 9035
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0-30.1 sec  1.17 MBytes  0.04 MBytes/sec
[  4] local 192.168.2.100 port 5001 connected with X.X.X.19 port 9050
[  4]  0.0-30.3 sec  1.17 MBytes  0.04 MBytes/sec

-- 
Tal Bar-or
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to