Thanks for the reply! I'll check the receiving side. Could you please
point me to an article/discussion describing the blocking- and
non-blocking NIC drivers? I didn't find it from iperf-users mailing
list..


regards,
Martin

On 8/21/14, Metod Kozelj <metod.koz...@lugos.si> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Martin T je dne 21/08/14 15:53 napisal-a:
>> if I executed "iperf -c 10.10.10.1 -fm -t 600 -i 60 -u -b 500m" in a
>> virtual-machine with GigE vNIC, then Iperf client(version 2.0.5) under
>> Debian sent traffic at 120Mbps during all the intervals. If I replaced
>> the OS in virtual-server with CentOS, the same Iperf release with the
>> same command was able to send traffic at 500Mbps.
>
> There used to be a discussion on this mailing list a few weeks ago ... some
>
> linux kernel drivers (together with IP stack drivers) work in blocking mode,
>
> and some in non-blocking mode. The difference, visible for application, is
> that in blocking mode application will not be able to TX more data until
> driver buffer gets flushed (enough) while in non-blocking mode kernel driver
>
> will discard data when buffers are full.
>
> What you should tell us is the following: what kind of performance do you
> see
> on the receiving side? Is it the same as on sending side (in both OS cases)
> or
> is it much different for either of OS choices? I would guess that the real
> GigE vNIC is around 120Mbps and Debian exposes that to iperf while CentOS
> drops data and thus hiding real performance from iperf.
> --
>
> Peace!
>    Mkx
>
> -- perl -e 'print
> $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
> -- echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D4D465452snlb xq | dc
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> BOFH excuse #178:
>
> short leg on process table
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to