what version of iperf did you use?  iperf -v should provide that.

If it's a later version of iperf2 the output on the client of with the -e
option could be helpful.

Bob

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Nikita Gupta <nikitar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Bruce thanks for giving time on this issue.
>
> I am working on an embedded system with imx50.
> Server i'm using is RaspberryPi. Both the machines are connected on same
> network.
>
> Yes the system is a bit loaded. So this might be the reason.
> But if I reduce the window size then bandwidth also reduces and the time
> interval issue disappears.
>
> But with bandwidth of ~45M (which is the max it is showing) then it starts
> giving time interval issues.
>
> One more thing, I tried with iperf as well and its not giving any such
> issues on same machine with same server.
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Bruce A. Mah <b...@es.net> wrote:
>
>> If memory serves me right, Nikita Gupta wrote:
>> > Hi team,
>> >
>> > While checking network performance using iperf3, I'm facing interval
>> > issue at client end. Below are the logs:
>> >
>> > [  5]   0.00-1.05   sec  11.2 MBytes  88.7 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   1.05-2.01   sec  10.0 MBytes  88.2 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   2.01-3.07   sec  11.2 MBytes  88.4 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   3.07-4.05   sec  10.3 MBytes  88.5 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   4.05-5.11   sec  11.2 MBytes  88.6 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   5.11-6.06   sec  10.0 MBytes  88.7 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   6.06-7.07   sec  10.7 MBytes  89.0 Mbits/sec    0   42.4
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   7.07-8.02   sec  10.0 MBytes  88.6 Mbits/sec    0   66.5
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   8.02-9.09   sec  11.1 MBytes  86.8 Mbits/sec    0    112
>> > KBytes
>> > [  5]   9.09-10.06  sec  10.0 MBytes  85.7 Mbits/sec    0    112
>> > KBytes
>> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
>> > [  5]   0.00-10.06  sec   106 MBytes  88.1 Mbits/sec    0
>> sender
>> > [  5]   0.00-10.12  sec   106 MBytes  87.6 Mbits/sec
>> > receiver
>> >
>> > I checked github bug #125 which was addressing this specific issue. But
>> > no help.
>> > I have tried iperf3.0.5, iperf3.1, iperf3.3, iperf3.5. In all versions,
>> > I'm getting the same issue.
>> >
>> > P.S. Server(with same iperf3 version) provides result as expected with 1
>> > sec time interval, but client provides data at different time intervals
>> > in every iteration.
>> > Kindly look into the issue and do let me know if m missing something.
>>
>> What are the command line arguments you are using (both client and
>> server side, sanitize them as necessary0?  Also could you say something
>> about the environment you're running in?  In particular, what OS and
>> hardware on the client and server, and what kind of network path are you
>> going over?
>>
>> I rarely see issues like this (where the statistics printing intervals
>> are not aligned to whole second boundaries) in the middle of a test,
>> although it's been known to happen at the end of a test, for conditions
>> that only happen at the end of a test.
>>
>> It seems like the timers within iperf3 that control when statistics and
>> computed and printed aren't firing when they're supposed to.  On my
>> laptop (MacBook Pro) this happens close enough to the correct time that
>> the timestamps appear to be exactly aligned to whole second boundaries
>> (they're not, but close enough given the precision of printing the
>> values in the output).  This situation could happen on slow hardware
>> (some kind of embedded system?), on a virtual machine, or on a system
>> that is very heavily loaded.  We would need some more information to
>> determine which of this is the case (or whether it's something
>> completely different).
>>
>> Bruce.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nikita Gupta
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to