Hi,

I’m not sure exactly what you’re trying to do, but have you looked at ’tc’ as a 
means to simulate loss?

Tim

> On 1 Aug 2020, at 00:29, Zufar Dhiyaulhaq <zufardhiyaul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
> Thanks for replying. In my understanding, when increasing the bitrate above 
> the bandwidth/throughput, it will increase the packet loss right? but in my 
> case, I increase to 9 Gbps and still not seeing any packet loss. Did 
> increasing window size will increasing packet loss? and why that can happen?
> 
> I am trying to simulate packet loss.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Best Regards,
> Zufar Dhiyaulhaq
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 5:28 AM Bob McMahon <bob.mcma...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Try to increase the window size with -w on the client.  This will allow the 
> operating system to accept the write and drop packets within the stack.  If 
> the window is too small the operating system will block the write until os 
> buffers are available.
> 
> Bob 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 8:56 AM Zufar Dhiyaulhaq <zufardhiyaul...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> I have a problem with iperf3, I try to simulate packet loss with Iperf3 with 
> increasing the bitrate above the bandwidth. But packet loss output not 
> increasing.
> 
> Ubuntu 18.04
> Iperf 3.7.3
> 
> I don't know why this is happening? Is there any bug with Iperf? this sounds 
> stupid for me.
> 
> ubuntu@vm1:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.0.92 --udp -t 20 --bitrate 9000m -R -V
> iperf 3.7
> Linux vm1 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 
> x86_64
> Control connection MSS 1390
> Setting UDP block size to 1390
> Time: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:53:39 GMT
> Connecting to host 192.168.0.92, port 5201
> Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.0.92 is sending
>       Cookie: geu5ktrvwtalkelbszen5ym4rzxfp5xgzwdy
>       Target Bitrate: 9000000000
> [  5] local 192.168.0.226 port 47999 connected to 192.168.0.92 port 5201
> Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1390 byte blocks, omitting 0 
> seconds, 20 second test, tos 0
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Jitter    Lost/Total 
> Datagrams
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  13.8 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec  0.081 ms  269/10704 
> (2.5%)  
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  13.7 MBytes   115 Mbits/sec  0.085 ms  0/10346 (0%)  
> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  13.6 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec  0.035 ms  126/10365 
> (1.2%)  
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  12.8 MBytes   107 Mbits/sec  0.033 ms  279/9946 
> (2.8%)  
> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  13.5 MBytes   113 Mbits/sec  0.051 ms  262/10427 
> (2.5%)  
> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  13.2 MBytes   111 Mbits/sec  0.058 ms  0/9965 (0%)  
> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  13.3 MBytes   111 Mbits/sec  0.044 ms  32/10047 
> (0.32%)  
> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  13.0 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec  0.053 ms  43/9874 
> (0.44%)  
> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  13.0 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec  0.042 ms  34/9847 
> (0.35%)  
> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  13.6 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec  0.055 ms  78/10305 
> (0.76%)  
> [  5]  10.00-11.00  sec  13.5 MBytes   113 Mbits/sec  0.070 ms  0/10171 (0%)  
> [  5]  11.00-12.00  sec  13.1 MBytes   110 Mbits/sec  0.047 ms  0/9851 (0%)  
> [  5]  12.00-13.00  sec  13.3 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec  0.034 ms  0/10055 (0%)  
> [  5]  13.00-14.00  sec  13.4 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec  0.040 ms  36/10136 
> (0.36%)  
> [  5]  14.00-15.00  sec  13.9 MBytes   117 Mbits/sec  0.055 ms  437/10921 
> (4%)  
> [  5]  15.00-16.00  sec  13.2 MBytes   111 Mbits/sec  0.043 ms  25/9964 
> (0.25%)  
> [  5]  16.00-17.00  sec  13.2 MBytes   110 Mbits/sec  0.043 ms  21/9942 
> (0.21%)  
> [  5]  17.00-18.00  sec  12.9 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec  0.046 ms  0/9702 (0%)  
> [  5]  18.00-19.00  sec  13.4 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec  0.050 ms  208/10294 
> (2%)  
> [  5]  19.00-20.00  sec  13.5 MBytes   113 Mbits/sec  0.048 ms  0/10152 (0%)  
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Test Complete. Summary Results:
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Jitter    Lost/Total 
> Datagrams
> [  5]   0.00-20.04  sec   269 MBytes   113 Mbits/sec  0.000 ms  0/203058 (0%) 
>  sender
> [  5]   0.00-20.00  sec   267 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec  0.048 ms  1850/203014 
> (0.91%)  receiver
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Best Regards,
> Zufar Dhiyaulhaq
> _______________________________________________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
> _______________________________________________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users


_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to