On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Darren Reed wrote: > to recommend you test with the latest 4.0alpha. That it's termed alpha > is not a reflection of the buginess, but rather there are a few > features (new) that I've not completely rounded out.
Would it be fair to say that if the new features are not used, it would be as robust as the latest 3.x version :)? I definitely understand the difference in efficiency regarding state table maintenance as you describe, but given that relatively few people are running the alpha version, I'm not sure if I want to run it in production on a critical link. -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 869-3781 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED] California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
