On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:35:17PM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote: > I did check this cause I had the same thought. First off, this > connection is NOT natted at all. Secondly, I only use "reipf" which > basically is:
That's what I get for not reading _all_ of your message. When I saw use
of RFC1918 space, I assumed NAT, not bothering to think of a connection
from an internal network to a local DMZ. My mistake. :|.
Anyway, if I'm reading the 'interfaces: ' line correctly, something
about it doesn't seem right. I'm completely guessing in this case.
Could you post a basic diagram showing the interfaces on the IPF box
with subnet information (even censored, e.g., 192.168.0.2 -> a.b.c.d)?
Assuming my understanding of the interface indexes is correct, I
would've expected something like
interfaces: in qfe0,qfe1 out qfe1,qfe0 where 192.168.2.12 is on qfe0
and 212.238.176.190 on qfe1
--
ryan beasley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG ID: 0x16EFBD48
msg02436/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
