Looks like the NetApp uses /etc/services to define what the port should be on?
ftp-data 20/tcp ftp 21/tcp telnet 23/tcp smtp 25/tcp time 37/tcp # Time Service time 37/udp # Time Service domain 53/udp # DNS domain 53/tcp # DNS portmap 111/udp portmap 111/tcp dhcps 67/udp # DHCP server dhcpc 68/udp # DHCP client tftp 69/udp http 80/tcp kerberos 88/udp # Kerberos 5 kerberos 88/tcp # Kerberos 5 nntp 119/tcp ntp 123/tcp # Network Time Protocol ntp 123/udp # Network Time Protocol netbios-name 137/udp # NetBIOS nameserver netbios-dg 138/udp # NetBIOS datagram service netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NetBIOS service session cifs-tcp 445/tcp # CIFS over TCP with NetBIOS framing snmp 161/udp shell 514/tcp syslog 514/udp route 520/udp kerberos-sec 750/udp # For compatibility with older "750" clients kerberos-sec 750/tcp # For compatibility with older "750" clients nfsd 2049/udp nfsd 2049/tcp iscsi-target 3260/tcp nlockmgr 4045/tcp # NLM nlockmgr 4045/udp mountd 4046/tcp # NFS mountd protocol mountd 4046/udp status 4047/tcp status 4047/udp pcnfsd 4048/tcp # PCNFS protocol pcnfsd 4048/udp rquotad 4049/udp ndmp 10000/tcp snapmirror 10566/tcp ndmp-local 32243/tcp # Internal connection inside NetApp box -----Original Message----- From: Olmsted, Brian Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:33 PM To: Olmsted, Brian; 'Hauke Fath' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Darren Reed'; 'Joseph Spenner'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: rules for NFS with NetApp and OOW packets Maybe inconclusive but this might be an older software release, etc. Here's another NetApp Filer that is different ports but they are all together, etc Perhaps it is configurable bash-2.02$ rpcinfo -p noc-na1-nfs program vers proto port service 100011 1 udp 608 rquotad 100021 4 tcp 607 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 607 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 607 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 606 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 606 nlockmgr 100021 1 udp 606 nlockmgr 100024 1 tcp 605 status 100024 1 udp 604 status 100005 3 tcp 603 mountd 100005 2 tcp 603 mountd 100005 1 tcp 603 mountd 100005 3 udp 602 mountd 100005 2 udp 602 mountd 100005 1 udp 602 mountd 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind bash-2.02$ -----Original Message----- From: Olmsted, Brian Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:30 PM To: 'Hauke Fath' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Darren Reed; Joseph Spenner; [email protected] Subject: RE: rules for NFS with NetApp and OOW packets Looks like the NetApp Filer using same ports as two other systems in another data centre that our group doesn't currently manage seem to have the same port assignments as the two that we manage. These two NetApp filers have most likely been rebooted over the past couple of years. This is good :) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /export/home/olm8980} $ rpcinfo -p corp-na1 program vers proto port service 100011 1 udp 4049 rquotad 100021 4 tcp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 1 udp 4045 nlockmgr 100024 1 tcp 4047 status 100024 1 udp 4047 status 100005 3 tcp 4046 mountd 100005 2 tcp 4046 mountd 100005 1 tcp 4046 mountd 100005 3 udp 4046 mountd 100005 2 udp 4046 mountd 100005 1 udp 4046 mountd 100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /export/home/olm8980} $ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /export/home/olm8980} $ rpcinfo -p corp-na2 program vers proto port service 100011 1 udp 4049 rquotad 100021 4 tcp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 4045 nlockmgr 100021 1 udp 4045 nlockmgr 100024 1 tcp 4047 status 100024 1 udp 4047 status 100005 3 tcp 4046 mountd 100005 2 tcp 4046 mountd 100005 1 tcp 4046 mountd 100005 3 udp 4046 mountd 100005 2 udp 4046 mountd 100005 1 udp 4046 mountd 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /export/home/olm8980} $ -----Original Message----- From: Hauke Fath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:59 AM To: Olmsted, Brian Cc: Hauke Fath; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Darren Reed; Joseph Spenner; [email protected] Subject: RE: rules for NFS with NetApp and OOW packets Am 14.03.2005 um 11:27 Uhr -0500 schrieb Olmsted, Brian: >Why is it that TWO different NetApps have the same port assignments? I know for sure that NetBSD port assignments for rpc services can change between boots, esp, if you add/remove services. Sounds like NetApps are NetBSD + something... hauke -- /~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath \ / No HTML/RTF in email Institut f�r Nachrichtentechnik X No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt / \ Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281
