Dareen
Are the changes (4.1 buffalo) that you made to try and fix the issues
with panics/stability of my platform incorporated into the source tree
of 4.1-next that you will release as 4.1.10?
I seem to be okay with 1-2 boxes but haven't put the release onto other
more critical systems at this point.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] w
2:33pm up 18 day(s), 16:40, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.01
User tty login@ idle JCPU PCPU what
root console 22Nov05 5 w
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkginfo -l ipfx
PKGINST: ipfx
NAME: IP Filter (64-bit)
CATEGORY: system
ARCH: sparc
VERSION: 4.1buffalo
VENDOR: Darren Reed
DESC: This package contains tools for building a firewall
INSTDATE: Nov 18 2005 16:50
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 13 installed pathnames
6 shared pathnames
6 directories
7 executables
2825 blocks used (approx)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkginfo -l ipf
PKGINST: ipf
NAME: IP Filter
CATEGORY: system
ARCH: sparc
VERSION: 4.1buffalo
VENDOR: Darren Reed
DESC: This package contains tools for building a firewall
INSTDATE: Nov 18 2005 16:50
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 100 installed pathnames
13 shared pathnames
7 linked files
26 directories
12 executables
4764 blocks used (approx)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkginfo -l pfil
PKGINST: pfil
NAME: Packet Filtering Interface
CATEGORY: system
ARCH: sparc
VERSION: 2.1.7,REV=08:36:50 11/18/05
BASEDIR: /
VENDOR: Darren Reed
DESC: Packet Filter Control Driver
INSTDATE: Nov 18 2005 16:49
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 24 installed pathnames
12 shared pathnames
4 linked files
14 directories
3 executables
252 blocks used (approx)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Reed
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:37 PM
To: Nick Evans
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture.
>
> Great! I'll test this as soon as I can, but it may not happen until
Friday
> night. If it works will we be able to get a patch against 3.4? All of
my
> production networks are still 3.4 based while I've been testing 4.1 on
> non-critical networks.
I'll do you a deal - if you can test this in the next 24 hours I'll
also fix the problem in 3.4 at the same time and mail you a patch in
time for the weekend.
I'd really like to get this tested so I can happily brand the "4.1next"
as "4.1.10" without any further changes.
Darren
