Peter Jeremy wrote:Peter Jeremy wrote: > ... > Is there anything particularly special about your choice of 2^N-1 > values for the moduli or can it be safely changed to a suitable prime > number? >
Only that LARGE_NAT is geared towards trying to be "faster" so it uses a prime to encourage the compiler to use '&' rather than '%'. That's probably insignificant with respect to other things, so 16383 should be some other number by default. Or in other words, you can tune it to be any number, just as you would without having LARGE_NAT defined. Darren
