>
>> I'm new to this list, and this is like the second submission I got in
>> like several weeks.  Is the volume of this list is really that low or
>> are responses encouraged to reply straight to the original poster?
>
> This mailing list used to be very, very busy. But you have to consider, IPF
> has been in development for at least a decade now (probably longer), and the
> software has meanwhile gotten to be pretty stable. And most people that use
> IPF know what they are doing, or else they wouldn't be using IPF.
>
> Besides, having the main ueber-IPF genius Darren Reed fix code faster than
> you can blink, and explain the most obscure IPF stuff, helps a lot with
> keeping the mailing list's volume down, and the software running smoothly.

Thank you for responding to this. I was confused about the OP's usage of the
word "like" twice in the first sentence.  I thought that he was using it to
indicate that the traffic was "similar to" the second submission in some
period of time "similar to" a span of several weeks.  :-P

-
Dennis

Reply via email to