Jim Klimov wrote:
> ...
>
> Just for kicks, I tried to comment away the whole block
> of these 2-4 lines you patched, to see what happens.
>
> I found that with without these lines our new gateway
> appears in the traces, as well as our next-hop cisco.
> Further hosts on the route thru internet do not respond,
> except for the destination host ("www.ru" = 194.87.0.50,
> a popular network-checking target here in Russia).
>
> During the previous tests it sometimes replied to the
> traceroutes, but sometimes it didn't. With htons/ntohs
> lines commented, it always replied.
Ok... so those lines need to be there...
With them there, what do you see from this when you try to traceroute:
dtrace -n 'fbt::fr_check:return{trace(arg1);}' -n
'fbt::ipf_hook:return{trace(arg1);}' -n 'fbt::ipf_hook:entry{self->hdr =
((hook_pkt_event_t *)arg1)->hpe_hdr;}' -n
'fbt::fr_check:entry{printf("len %d", ((struct ip *)self->hdr)->ip_len);}'
Darren
