On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Darren Reed wrote: > Also, try this with dtrace:
Ok, that hit a few times: CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 3 41493 fr_addstate:return num 136 max 72901 3 41493 fr_addstate:return num 167 max 72901 3 41493 fr_addstate:return num 219 max 72901 Do you still have insight into the actual code shipping in commercial Solaris, or could it possibly have been munged by Sun engineers by now into something completely different than your original code? Perhaps this is a bug they introduced, regressions in ipf patches seem a pretty common occurance <sigh>... -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [email protected] California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
