Didn't hear of any issues, into CVS it goes.
Al
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:37 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> We recently hit:
>
> ipmitool: lanplus.c:2114: ipmi_lanplus_send_payload: Assertion
> `session->v2_data.session_state == LANPLUS_STATE_RAKP_2_RECEIVED' failed.
> Abort (core dumped)
>
> When a bad ipmi password was used during a SOL activate w/ ipmitool
> 1.8.9.
>
> Seems if you have a bad IPMI password, the bad HMAC returned on on rakp2
> is ignored, thus rakp 3 is sent anyways. The sending of
> rakp3 changes the session state. The remote BMC ignores rakp 3 (or it
> could timeout, doesn't matter either way) ipmitool resends rakp3, and
> thus we hit the assertion.
>
> The proposed fix is to not ignore the bad HMAC.
>
> diff -p -u -r1.58 lanplus.c
> --- src/plugins/lanplus/lanplus.c 23 Feb 2007 15:12:20 -0000 1.58
> +++ src/plugins/lanplus/lanplus.c 28 Mar 2007 00:22:27 -0000
> @@ -2962,6 +2962,7 @@ ipmi_lanplus_rakp1(struct ipmi_intf * in
> /* Error */
> lprintf(LOG_INFO, "> RAKP 2 HMAC is invalid");
> session->v2_data.rakp2_return_code =
> IPMI_RAKP_STATUS_INVALID_INTEGRITY_CHECK_VALUE;
> + rc = 1;
> }
> else
> {
>
> Al
>
--
Albert Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
925-422-5311
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
