Isabelle, Francois wrote: > We should ask the author: > revision 1.71 > date: 2006/10/25 03:21:57; author: jharg; state: Exp; lines: +0 -8 > Do not use readings for sensors with Sensor Scanning bit cleared > > === > > I think that even with scanning disabled, the reading might be valid and must > be returned, > if the reading is not valid, the MC should return "update in progress" if the > scanning never took place or the state of the sensor can't be detected , or > D5h or whatever non-zero > completion code. > > Francois Isabelle > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James >>Pearson >>Sent: 30 avril, 2007 06:38 >>To: Brian A. Seklecki >>Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMITool 1.8.9 Bad Values on >>PowerEdge SDR >>List (WAS: [Fwd: [netops] ipmitool - timeout causes core dumps) >> >> >>Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >> >>>What's your feeling? Revert it or make it >> >>conditional/optional behavior >> >>>based on a flag? >> >>I have no idea why it it was removed from 1.8.9 - I just noticed that >>putting it back gives the same output as 1.8.8. >> >>I assume there was a good reason for this change ? >> >>James Pearson
Just to follow up on this - is this going to be 'fixed' for future releases of ipmitool? Thanks James Pearson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
