Duncan,
I can't commit to being able to submit changes for you, but I'll help out if I
can.
Do you have any thoughts on specific functions you think there would be value
in testing?
-- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com --
On 4/9/2012 8:59 AM, Duncan Idaho wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to write couple of unit tests, because I think ipmitool would
> really made use of some. However in one talk I've heard urge not to write own
> unit-test framework, or something like that, I think. Hence I'm wondering
> whether it is going to be enough if these unit tests are going to be simple
> C-code "snippets" or whether some unit test framework should be utilized? In
> case of latter I'm afraid of problems with license and what not, so I would
> vote for simple C-code snippets.
>
> ~~~ SNIP
> #<...includes...>
>
> int
> main()
> {
> // declarations
> if ( (rc = some_function()) ) {
> printf("FAIL: some_function: Got %s, expected %s", rc, expected);
> } else {
> printf("PASS: some_function: Got %s, expected %s", rc, expected);
> }
> /* and so on so forth */
> }
> ~~~ SNIP
>
> or something like that is what I have in mind.And place these under
> './src/tests' or just './tests'.
>
> Even though I'm sure it is a crappy solution, I think it is better than none.
> I'm also open to any other ideas.
>
> Jim, can I rely on you these will get committed into CVS?
>
> Thanks,
> Duncan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
