On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Jens Nyberg <jens.nyb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Jens Nyberg and I work as part of a team at Ericsson that > currently are working on IPMI support for Ericsson Blade Systems > (EBS). Previous iterations of these systems had been using there own > specialized IPMI protocol which was incompatible with the standard but > for the next generation we are trying to conform more to the standard > protocol. > > We have, besides supporting some of the default ipmi commands, also > developed an extension. This extension uses the keyword ericssonoem, > the same way as you have sunoem or delloem today. > > I now would like to know what is the recommended way for us to share > our extension upstream? I have forked the git repository on > Sourceforge and I assume all I need to do is to create a merge request > once I have uploaded the changes? >
Please, see http://sourceforge.net/p/ipmitool/wiki/coding_standards/ before you post anything. Thanks, Z. > As far as the changes involved they are pretty straightforward so they > shouldn't be invasive at all. They are currently based on the latest > tagged commit but we could easily rebase it to the latest master if > you prefer. I assume ipmitool is one-track? > > Thanks > > / Jens > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Ipmitool-devel mailing list > Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
